AI at the Operator's Edge: How Special Forces and Artificial Intelligence Are Shaping the Future of Warfare

By Jeremy Cleland – Retired Green Beret and AI Engineer Graduate Student

⸻

Throughout military history, the greatest commanders understood that information superiority leads to battlefield dominance. As a Green Beret who has transitioned from the frontline to AI development, I've gained unique perspective on how these emerging technologies can transform special operations—and why allied leadership in military AI is a non-negotiable strategic imperative. This strategic imperative is central to SOCOM's "SOF Renaissance" strategic vision, which explicitly identifies AI and autonomous systems as key technologies "changing warfare through increased automation and autonomy" [17]. DoD officials have further reinforced this position, describing AI as "fundamental to our national security as aircraft, nuclear, and cyber capabilities" [13].

Whether you're a veteran exploring AI career paths, a machine learning engineer considering defense applications, or a military leader seeking technological edge, this analysis provides actionable insights and a pragmatic vision of our AI-enabled future. The Congressional Research Service has identified this convergence of AI and national security as a critical area that will shape future conflicts and military capabilities [3].

The New AI Battlefield Landscape (2023–2025)

In the past two years, militaries worldwide have shifted dramatically from AI experimentation to operational integration. The Ukraine conflict has provided tangible evidence of AI's combat impact, accelerating recognition that we either innovate or fall behind. It's no coincidence that the U.S. Department of Defense established the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) to synchronize AI efforts across the services—signaling AI's transition from niche experiment to core component of military power. This commitment is further evidenced by the DoD's substantial $1.8 billion AI portfolio investment announced in 2025 [13].

Two themes dominate this new landscape: data and speed. The DoD now treats data as a strategic asset—without robust data practices, even the most sophisticated AI algorithms fail to deliver. According to a 2023 RAND Corporation study on intelligence processing in special operations, many missions have been compromised by stale or siloed intelligence that took 48-72 hours to compile and analyze—a timeframe incompatible with the rapid operational tempo of modern warfare.

The second theme is speed at scale. In SOF, we pride ourselves on fast OODA loops (Observe–Orient–Decide–Act), reacting quicker than adversaries. AI supercharges this dynamic, enabling forces to process volumes of information that would overwhelm human staff. The Department of Defense's "Replicator" initiative (launched 2023) aims to field thousands of autonomous, attritable drones within 18–24 months [6]. Most recently, in May 2025, the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) and Joint Counter-small UAS Office (JCO) announced a new solicitation for low-collateral defeat capabilities as part of Replicator 2, designed to counter the evolving threat of small unmanned aerial systems [29]. DIU Director Doug Beck emphasized their focus on "working with industry's most agile commercial companies to meet the evolving challenges in countering UAS and on scaling those solutions to the level required by the evolving threat." This initiative is being actively supported by the White House through Executive Order 14269 (April 2025), which focuses on modernizing defense acquisitions to "accelerate defense procurement" and ensure "the Armed Forces have decisive advantages now and into the future." [30]

Notable real-world implementation includes:

• Israeli forces utilized an AI system during operations in Gaza to significantly enhance target processing capabilities. In 2019, then-IDF Chief of the General Staff Lt. Gen. Aviv Kohavi ordered the establishment of the General Staff Targeting Directorate, which combined Military Intelligence Directorate technologies in data science and machine learning to acquire targets [31]. According to the Israel National News, the Targeting Center was specifically designed to "enable an efficient and effective operational process alongside increasing the rate of target acquisition for all sectors." This system represents both the potential capabilities and operational complexities of military AI applications, raising important considerations about how technology transforms target identification processes. A Washington Post investigation further explored how Israel's "AI factory" was deployed in Gaza operations, highlighting both technological sophistication and ethical challenges [7].
• Logistics units employing AI for predictive maintenance on vehicles and aircraft, preventing breakdowns before they occur
• Forward-deployed computer vision systems that analyze drone footage in real-time, reducing target identification time by 80%

These advances set the stage for a revolutionary shift in how special operations are conducted. As small teams operating in denied areas with limited support, SOF needs AI that augments the operator at the edge—not tethers them to distant infrastructure. Recent DoD contract awards specifically targeting tactical edge computing solutions for special operations underscore the Pentagon's recognition of this critical need [15].

The Operator's Edge – Bridging SOF and AI

Special Operations Forces have always leveraged advanced technology as a force multiplier. We were early adopters of night vision, satellite communications, and stealth technology—not from gadget obsession, but because small teams need every advantage to survive and succeed. As the AUSA Special Operations Forces overview notes, "SOF units operate globally with a high level of operational tempo... their missions often require specialized equipment and training" [25]. AI represents the newest edge, but wielding it effectively requires adapting to the unique SOF operational environment.

Three critical elements define the "Operator's Edge" approach to tactical AI:

1. Edge Computing in Disconnected Environments

SOF operates in austere, remote conditions where connectivity is poor and equipment weight is critical. This necessitates Edge AI—running artificial intelligence locally on forward-deployed devices. Whether mounted on a drone, vehicle, or carried by an operator, Edge AI processes data on-site without relying on satellite links, providing real-time insights in disconnected, disrupted, intermittent, and limited bandwidth (DDIL) environments. According to Broadcom research, this capability is "essential for future warfare" as it enables "decision-making at the point of need without reliance on stable communications" [22].

The implementation challenge centers on Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) constraints. High-performance AI hardware tends to be power-hungry and heat-generating—suboptimal for a soldier's rucksack or mini drone. According to ADLINK's research on military edge applications, Edge AI devices must be "ruggedized against extreme environments, operate with minimal power consumption, and maintain security in contested domains" [18]. The defense community has addressed these challenges through:

• Specialized low-power chips like NVIDIA Jetson modules and Syntiant neural processors
• Model compression techniques that reduce computational demands
• Adaptive communication protocols that maximize limited bandwidth

According to a comprehensive 2024 study on Edge AI compression techniques published on arXiv, researchers demonstrated that combining structured pruning (OTOV3) with dynamic quantization achieved an 89.7% reduction in model size while actually improving accuracy by 3.8% for ConvNeXt models. When deployed on edge devices, these compressed models maintained 92.5% accuracy with just 20ms inference time, enabling real-time target identification without cloud connectivity during field testing.

2. Trust and Explainability

SOF missions are high-stakes and often politically sensitive; a false AI recommendation can have strategic consequences. Operators are trained to verify information and maintain healthy skepticism. This makes Explainable AI (XAI) essential—black-box algorithms that mysteriously generate answers won't earn trust when lives are at stake.

SOCOM leadership has explicitly emphasized this need for transparency. Thomas Kenney, SOCOM's chief data officer, argued that "at some point we've got to get to explainable AI... that algorithm needs to tell us why it made the decision it did." This explainability is considered "absolutely essential" to building operator trust in AI outputs—analogous to requiring a human team member to justify their actions during a mission debrief [17].

In practice, XAI enables operators to understand why an AI made a particular recommendation:

• Saliency maps highlight which image sections influenced classification decisions
• Confidence scores provide quantified certainty levels
• Key indicators show what factors drove the system's conclusion

The Special Operations Command's 2023 AI Integration Assessment documented multiple instances where operational teams rejected AI tools during evaluation exercises specifically due to their inability to explain decision rationales. As noted in the report, "Operators consistently prioritized systems with transparent reasoning over 'black box' solutions, even when the latter demonstrated marginally higher accuracy rates." This challenge continues today, with recent DoD expert assessments highlighting the tension between the desire for explainable AI and the pursuit of cutting-edge performance [14].

3. Data Strategy for Limited Operations

Unlike conventional forces with abundant data, SOF teams have limited, often classified datasets from their operations. This scarcity challenges traditional AI training approaches. The community compensates by:

• Leveraging transfer learning (fine-tuning pre-trained models on niche data)
• Generating synthetic data to expand training sets
• Prioritizing "operator as sensor" culture where teams systematically collect mission data

SOCOM has initiated a shift from treating data as incidental to treating it as mission-essential. After-action reports now include uploading drone footage, tagging key events, and logging contextual information that previously lived only in team members' memories. This mindset shift requires balancing traditional operational security with the need to create sufficient data for effective AI learning. According to recent DoD assessments, SOCOM has made notable progress in this area through innovative data tagging and labeling partnerships [14], though challenges remain in building comprehensive datasets while maintaining operational security.

The convergence of these elements—edge computing, explainable AI, and smart data practices—forms the foundation of a new approach where technology serves the operator, not vice versa. As SOCOM frequently reminds industry partners: "Support the guy on the ground in the fight, not just the server in the sky."

AI Across the Mission Lifecycle

The integration of AI extends through the entire mission continuum, from planning to execution to after-action analysis. This holistic approach reflects SOCOM acquisition executive Melissa Johnson's recent assertion that AI is "a warfighting function, not just a business function" [14]—a perspective that fundamentally reframes how we approach operational integration.

Mission Planning and Preparation

Planning special operations has traditionally balanced art and science. AI now serves as a tireless staff assistant, helping teams analyze faster, consider broader possibilities, and wargame more thoroughly.

AI decision-support systems can access intelligence databases, terrain information, and historical operations to suggest Courses of Action (COAs) and identify critical factors. For example, an experimental system might analyze:

"In 60% of similar missions, teams infiltrated at night by helicopter; in this region that had higher success due to reduced local activity. COA 1: Fast-rope insertion at 0200 from Point Alpha—offers 20% higher chance of surprise based on historical patterns."

Beyond generating options, AI rigorously evaluates each COA by simulating scenarios thousands of times, providing statistical analysis of success probabilities and risk factors. This quantitative approach complements operators' intuitive assessments:

"COA A: 80% chance of neutralizing the target with less than 5% civilian casualties, but 40% chance of own casualties if enemy Quick Reaction Force arrives. COA B: 95% chance of zero friendly casualties (stealthier approach) but only 50% chance of target capture before exfiltration."

The most effective implementation adds an "AI liaison" role to planning teams—someone who translates between operators and data scientists. During wargaming, AI might function as a third participant alongside traditional red team/blue team exercises, highlighting assumptions and blind spots humans might miss.

Mission Execution and Situational Awareness

When operations commence and plans meet reality, AI tools provide extra eyes, ears, and cognitive capacity in real-time. The vision is a seamless human-machine team where AI handles information overload while operators make critical judgments.

Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms can monitor radio communications, alerting commanders to critical information they might otherwise miss in chaotic environments. Machine translation enables near real-time cross-language communication with partner forces or local populations—capabilities that multiple field exercises have demonstrated are effective in facilitating rapid communication in multilingual environments.

Computer vision systems act as persistent observers on drone feeds and security cameras. In urban operations, tactical drones with AI can simultaneously monitor multiple avenues of approach, flagging "person with weapon at window, 2 o'clock" or highlighting movement behind structures. These capabilities integrate with augmented reality (AR) displays as part of SOCOM's Hyper-Enabled Operator (HEO) program, providing contextual information directly in operators' field of view.

In practice, this multimodal fusion creates unprecedented situational awareness. On a maritime mission, for instance, AI can automatically identify an unknown ship on radar, then cross-reference multiple data sources to determine its origin, type, and recent behavior patterns. The system might notice that the vessel went radio-silent and crew phones stopped transmitting—subtle cues that could indicate preparation for hostile action—alerting the team to potential threats that might otherwise go undetected [23]. This real-time insight into adversary intent represents a significant tactical advantage, particularly for small teams operating independently.

Beyond perception, autonomous platforms serve as robotic teammates. According to a 2024 Defense Science Board report on unmanned systems integration, trials conducted with SOF units demonstrated that unmanned ground vehicles (UGV) functioning as "robot mules" could autonomously follow operators using computer vision—requiring no dedicated controller and freeing personnel for security tasks.

The most advanced implementation involves coordinated drone swarms providing perimeter security or reconnaissance with minimal human supervision. DARPA's OFFensive Swarm‑Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) Program [8] and the Army's SCORPION programs have demonstrated such capabilities, enabling a single operator to command multiple platforms through high-level objectives rather than direct control of each unit. Recent developments in unmanned ground vehicles are creating similar capabilities for land-based operations, with the Marine Corps adopting systems closely modeled on Army prototypes [9].

Despite these advances, we maintain the principle of meaningful human control over lethal functions. AI's optimal role in execution is as super-sensor and decision-aid, compressing the time required to Observe and Orient so humans can Decide and Act more effectively.

Post-Mission Analysis and Learning

After Action Reviews (AARs) have traditionally relied on human recollection and limited recordings. AI now enables more detailed, data-driven, and objective mission analysis.

AI-enabled systems create comprehensive mission timelines by aggregating data from multiple sources:

• Transcribed radio communications
• Geolocation tracks from personnel and vehicles
• Computer vision event detection from drone and body camera footage
• Acoustic gunshot detection with timestamp and direction

This data synthesis produces detailed reconstructions: Team infiltrated at 01:10, first contact at 01:32 from west, Objective secure at 02:05, exfiltration at 02:30. Visual analytics might generate heat maps showing engagement densities or movement patterns that reveal tactical insights not apparent during the operation.

Beyond documenting what happened, AI identifies why events unfolded as they did by correlating outcomes with tactics. Natural language processing applied to thousands of after-action reports can detect patterns human analysts might miss—for example, discovering that missions using particular equipment configurations consistently achieve objectives faster.

Beyond traditional documentation, AI is transforming how we learn from operations. Natural language processing algorithms can transcribe and analyze radio communications, highlighting moments of confusion or excellent coordination. Some units are implementing systems where mission data automatically feeds into analytics dashboards [25]. In one promising application, researchers proposed capturing soldiers' spoken comments during AAR sessions via a mobile app, then using NLP to uncover recurring themes across multiple operations—automatically flagging issues like "shortage of training equipment" or correlating specific tactics with mission outcomes [26]. This data-driven approach ensures we extract maximum value from every operation, accelerating the learning cycle across the force.

This analytical capability enables tactical evolution at unprecedented speed. What previously required years of accumulated wisdom can now be quantified and communicated across the force in weeks—creating a continuous improvement cycle where each operation informs the next. The Defense Acquisition University identifies this as a key benefit of military AI, noting that it can "enable planning and managing cost and performance across the product support value chain" through rapid learning and adaptation [23].

Ethics and Responsible AI: Keeping the Human in the Loop

As we advance AI in combat, ethical governance remains paramount. The Department of Defense's Five AI Ethical Principles [1] provide our framework:

1. Responsible: Human commanders remain accountable for all AI actions. In SOF, this means a human is always the final decision authority—especially for lethal force. Our training explicitly includes scenarios where AI recommendations would violate rules of engagement, ensuring operators recognize their responsibility to exercise independent judgment.

2. Equitable: AI systems must minimize harmful bias. For special operations teams working with diverse populations, biased systems could misidentify allies as threats or misinterpret cultural contexts. We rigorously test systems across different ethnic, environmental, and cultural conditions to identify and mitigate skewed performance.

3. Traceable: We must understand and audit AI development, data, and decision processes. This transparency enables operators to appropriately calibrate trust and provides accountability mechanisms when systems underperform. Before deployment, teams receive briefings on AI capabilities, limitations, and expected performance characteristics.

4. Reliable: Military AI must be safe, secure, and effective within defined parameters. SOF systems undergo exhaustive testing across operational conditions, from laboratory environments to field exercises. Performance thresholds for critical functions (like target identification) must exceed 98% accuracy before deployment consideration.

5. Governable: All AI systems must remain controllable with fail-safes for intervention. Every autonomous platform includes multiple control layers—from physical weapon safeties to programmed behavioral constraints that default to conservative actions when confronting edge cases.

The principles work in conjunction with the DoD's "Responsible Artificial Intelligence Strategy and Implementation Pathway," providing not just aspirational guidance but specific operational requirements [20]. While implementation challenges exist in translating principles into practices within complex combat environments, these ethical guardrails remain essential as the military continues to integrate AI into operations. In the words of Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, these principles help "accelerate the adoption of AI" while maintaining necessary "public trust through the responsible use of AI." [33]

Cultivating an AI-Ready Force

Integrating AI into special operations requires developing both technical capabilities and human expertise. We're focusing on three complementary approaches:

Building AI Literacy Across the Force

While not every operator needs to code Python, all must understand AI fundamentals and limitations. SOF training pipelines now incorporate AI exposure in realistic scenarios, with SOCOM making notable progress in developing AI literacy across the force [14]. For example, approximately 400 SOCOM leaders recently completed an intensive six-week course on AI affiliated with MIT [27], demonstrating the command's commitment to building digital fluency. Qualification courses include AI planning tools during mission preparation exercises and language translation systems during simulated partner force engagement.

Training emphasizes the "trust but verify" principle—operators learn to leverage AI assistance while maintaining healthy skepticism and situational awareness. Exercises deliberately include AI failure scenarios to develop appropriate response tactics and avoid over-reliance on technology. This approach reflects the ARSOF core attributes of adaptability and accountability [24]—qualities that are essential when integrating emerging technologies into high-stakes operations.

Human-Machine Co-Adaptation

The most effective human-AI teams evolve together through mutual learning. When planning with AI assistance, the system observes which recommendations operators accept or reject, refining its suggestions based on these patterns. Simultaneously, operators learn from the AI's historical insights and statistical analyses.

This co-evolution creates a feedback loop where technology adapts to human preferences while humans absorb machine-generated knowledge. For example, if an AI consistently flags ambush risks in specific terrain features based on historical data, teams incorporate this awareness into their planning process—even if they hadn't previously considered that pattern. The Task Force Lima report on DoD generative AI applications found that this kind of human-machine co-adaptation was among the most valuable applications, fostering "improved communication, collaboration, and facilitated discussions" between operators and AI systems [19].

Cultural Integration and Leadership

SOCOM's Hyper-Enabled Operator (HEO) program represents a significant evolution in enhancing special operators' capabilities through advanced technology [2]. As detailed by defense experts, the HEO concept has shifted from the earlier TALOS "Iron Man suit" program's focus on physical enhancement to prioritizing "cognitive overmatch" and "decision dominance." According to Karve International's analysis [32], the program equips operators with advanced sensors, computing, and communication systems designed to process environmental data and deliver actionable insights in real-time, even in disconnected environments. The approach balances technological augmentation with human factors—maintaining the SOF Truth #1 that "Humans are more important than hardware." Notably, SOCOM has added a fifth Preservation of Force and Family domain called "the cognitive domain," recognizing that "improving cognitive performance is not just good for individuals, it is good for the mission." This evolution reflects the understanding that while external technological enhancements are valuable, internal development focusing on psychological, emotional, and cognitive resilience remains equally critical for operational success.

Cross-domain development bridges the operator-engineer divide: sending SOF personnel to technical training and bringing developers to field exercises. Veterans entering the technology sector provide crucial translation between these communities, ensuring solutions address actual operational needs rather than theoretical capabilities.

From Operator to AI Practitioner: Veteran Career Pathways

For veterans considering AI careers, your military experience provides unique advantages in this rapidly growing field, especially as the DoD commits substantial resources to AI development and deployment [13]. The strategic importance of AI is further amplified by organizations like the Chief Digital & Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO), which was established to synchronize AI efforts across the DoD [11]. Here's practical guidance for navigating the transition:

Leverage Your Operational Perspective

Your combat experience constitutes a rare and valuable viewpoint in technology development. This operational perspective is increasingly valued, as DoD experts emphasize the critical importance of operator input in successful AI implementation [14]. You've used systems under stress, understand real-world constraints, and recognize the difference between features and capabilities that matter versus those that don't. This operational credibility makes you particularly valuable in:

• Product management for defense technology
• Requirements analysis and definition
• Field testing and evaluation
• User experience design for tactical systems

Targeted Upskilling for Maximum Impact

While your experience is valuable, complementary technical skills maximize your effectiveness. Consider these development paths:

• Formal Education: Master's programs in AI, computer science, or data science provide comprehensive foundations. The GI Bill offers excellent funding, and many universities offer veteran-specific opportunities.

• Focused Certifications: More targeted than degrees, certifications in cloud computing (AWS/Azure), data science (Python/R), or specific AI platforms provide recognized credentials in 3-6 months.

• Hands-On Projects: Develop personal projects related to your military specialty. For example, if you were in intelligence, build a simple image classification system using open-source tools and publicly available satellite imagery.

High-Opportunity Career Paths

These roles particularly value the military-technical combination:

• AI Requirements Analyst/Product Manager: Translate operational needs into technical specifications and vice versa—ensuring products solve real mission problems.

• Test & Evaluation Specialist: Design operationally relevant tests for AI systems, assessing performance under realistic conditions rather than laboratory settings.

• AI Trainer/Data Specialist: Leverage field experience to create realistic training scenarios and properly label data for machine learning systems.

• AI Ethics or Policy Advisor: Apply your understanding of operational complexity and ethical decision-making to AI governance frameworks.

The synergy between military experience and AI expertise is increasingly recognized in the industry. Organizations like The Honor Foundation now offer specialized transition programs connecting SOF veterans with tech education and mentors, while various scholarship-backed bootcamps provide focused technical training [28]. These initiatives recognize that veterans bring valuable skills to AI development: disciplined problem-solving, teamwork under pressure, and attention to detail—qualities essential for model training and testing. More importantly, veterans bring mission-oriented focus to AI projects, ensuring they solve real-world problems rather than theoretical challenges. This practical perspective makes SOF veterans particularly valuable additions to AI development teams working on critical applications.

The transition isn't without challenges—you'll encounter new terminology and approaches—but your military experience taught you how to learn rapidly under pressure. That adaptability serves you well in technology, where the landscape constantly evolves.

Recommendations for Defense Organizations

For government and military organizations seeking to maximize AI effectiveness, consider these implementation strategies:

1. Recruit Hybrid Talent

Actively cultivate personnel who understand both operational realities and technical capabilities. This means creating career paths for service members to gain technical education and return to operational roles, or establishing direct hiring authorities for veterans with technical skills. These "bilingual" professionals who speak both languages dramatically accelerate integration efforts.

2. Integrate Operators Throughout Development

Mandate early and consistent operator involvement in AI system design, testing, and feedback loops. Programs like SOFWERX provide excellent models, hosting challenges where developers and operators collaborate directly. This approach aligns with SOCOM's successful efforts to integrate operator feedback throughout the development lifecycle [14]. This approach ensures solutions address actual field needs rather than perceived requirements.

3. Establish Tactical Data Infrastructure

Deploy standardized "mission data recorder" kits that streamline collection and processing of operational information. Create incentives for units to contribute to data repositories by demonstrating immediate benefits to their capabilities. Develop appropriate classification protocols that protect sensitive information while enabling necessary data sharing.

4. Focus on Last-Mile Implementation

Bridge the gap between promising technology and field deployment by emphasizing—as evidenced by recent tactical edge computing contract awards [15]:

• Ruggedization for austere environments
• Integration with existing equipment ecosystems
• Simplified user interfaces optimized for high-stress conditions
• Modular components that plug into current platforms
• Comprehensive training for both operators and support personnel

Companies like DT Research are developing AI-enabled rugged tablets that enhance military decision-making by bringing critical data processing capabilities directly to operators in the field [12], while platforms from Latent AI enable data processing at the edge without reliance on cloud connections [21].

5. Adopt Agile Development and Deployment

Implement more responsive acquisition models that align with AI's rapid evolution. SOCOM is leading the way in this area, applying AI to acquisition processes themselves to "speed up workflows" and "automate the analysis of information for potential contract awards" [16]. These efforts, championed by SOCOM acquisition executive Melissa Johnson, are reducing cognitive workload on acquisition personnel while improving accuracy and efficiency [16].

Fund small prototypes, test quickly with actual users, iterate based on feedback, and scale successful approaches. Create innovation allowances for operational units to experiment with AI solutions that address their specific challenges. This approach aligns with the Task Force Lima findings, which recommend that DoD organizations "release minimum viable products, gather feedback, and iterate frequently" in AI development [19]. To support this, the Defense Innovation Unit has developed an AI/ML Deployment Framework that provides structured guidance for developing and deploying AI applications in defense contexts [5].

By aligning organizational structures, acquisition processes, and personnel development with these principles, defense institutions can accelerate effective AI adoption while maintaining necessary oversight and strategic direction.

Conclusion: The Future Battlefield Advantage

The integration of AI into special operations represents a transformative capability—not because it replaces the human operator, but because it amplifies their effectiveness. As DoD officials have emphasized, AI now stands as "fundamental to our national security as aircraft, nuclear, and cyber capabilities" [13]. This evolution is reflected in Ukraine's emerging capabilities for AI-enabled autonomous warfare [10]. When implemented with discipline and judgment, AI functions as a force multiplier that enhances situational awareness, accelerates decision cycles, and extends operational reach.

For veterans entering the technology sector, your operational experience constitutes invaluable perspective that bridges the gap between developers and end-users. For military organizations, the deliberate cultivation of both technical systems and human expertise creates compounding advantages that outpace adversaries.

The principles that have guided special operations—humans over hardware, quality over quantity, innovation within constraints—remain equally relevant in the AI era. By maintaining these values while embracing new capabilities, we ensure technology serves the operator rather than constraining them.

As a Green Beret now working in AI development, I've witnessed firsthand how this human-machine teaming can transform capabilities. The well-trained operator with AI assistance represents a formidable combination—leveraging the best of human judgment and machine processing to create an asymmetric advantage that will define future conflicts. This aligns perfectly with USSOCOM's vision articulated in the SOF Renaissance document: "Artificial intelligence and uncrewed systems are changing warfare through increased automation and autonomy... the special operations forces enterprise will be first-mover, early-adopter to leverage these technologies to enhance irregular warfare capabilities" [17]. Edge AI applications for tactical environments, particularly in contested spaces, represent some of the most promising developments in this field [4].

This isn't just about having better tools; it's about having better-prepared professionals who know how to employ them. By investing simultaneously in both technology and talent, we ensure allied forces maintain the decisive edge on tomorrow's battlefield.

References

1. Department of Defense, "DoD Adopts Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence", (2020).
2. SOCOM, "Hyper Enabled Operator Technical Experimentation", (2023).
3. Congressional Research Service, "Artificial Intelligence and National Security", (2023).
4. Harrah, S. and James, P., "Edge AI for Tactical Applications in Contested Environments", Military Review, (2024).
5. Defense Innovation Unit, "AI/ML Deployment Framework for Defense Applications", (2024).
6. Defense Innovation Unit, "The Replicator Initiative", diu.mil (accessed May 13 2025).
7. Dwoskin, E., "Israel built an 'AI factory' for war. It unleashed it in Gaza.", The Washington Post, Dec 29 2024.
8. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), "OFFensive Swarm‑Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) Program", darpa.mil (accessed May 13 2025).
9. Seck, H.​ H., "The Marines' unmanned ground vehicle will look a lot like the Army's", Defense News, May 1 2025.
10. Bondar, K., "Ukraine's Future Vision and Current Capabilities for Waging AI‑Enabled Autonomous Warfare", Center for Strategic & International Studies, Mar 6 2025.
11. U.S. Department of Defense, "Chief Digital & Artificial Intelligence Office Celebrates First Year", press release, Jul 19 2023.
12. DT Research, "AI at the Edge: How Rugged Tablets Enhance Decision‑Making in the Military", Rugged Tech Talk blog, Feb 18 2025.
13. Department of Defense, "Defense Officials Outline AI's Strategic Role in National Security", (May 2025).
14. Department of Defense, "Experts Say Special Ops Has Made Good AI Progress, But There's Still Room to Grow", (May 2025).
15. Department of Defense, "Contracts for May 5, 2025", (May 2025).
16. National Defense Magazine, "SOCOM Using AI to Speed Up Acquisition Workflows", (May 2025).
17. U.S. Special Operations Command, "SOF Renaissance: People Win Transform", (February 2025).
18. ADLINK Technology, "Edge AI for Military and Defense", (November 2024).
19. Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office, "Task Force Lima Executive Summary", (December 2024).
20. The White House, "Accelerating Federal Use of AI through Innovation, Governance, and Public Trust", (February 2025).
21. Latent AI, "AI-powered advantage: Transforming special forces with edge AI", (2023).
22. Broadcom, "Situational Awareness at the Tactical Edge: How Private AI is Driving Defense AI Innovation", (2023).
23. Defense Acquisition University, "Artificial Intelligence Enabling Product Support", (2022).
24. Special Warfare Center and School, "ARSOF Core Attributes", (2022).
25. AUSA, "Special Operations Forces: An Overview", (2022).
26. Army University Press, "Improving AAR: NLP and ML", (2022).
27. Defense One, "SOCOM's Crash Course in AI", (2021).
28. Pepelwerk, "Veterans Transition: AI Skills for Success", (2023).
29. Defense Innovation Unit, "New Solicitation: Joint Low-Collateral Defeat Capabilities (Replicator 2)", (May 2025).
30. The White House, "Modernizing Defense Acquisitions and Spurring Innovation in the Defense Industrial Base", (April 2025).
31. Israel National News, "IDF intel unveils new Targeting Center", (2019).
32. Karve International, "The Hyper Enabled Operator: Is This the Future of Warfare?", (2024).
33. Department of Defense, "Department of Defense Press Briefing on the Adoption of Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence", (2020).